After mass protests compelled long-term Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to resign and flee the nation in early August, Bangladesh discovered itself in a novel second of alternative to chart a path in direction of true democracy.
The interim authorities that was put in place to cope with the legacy of Hasina’s 15-year authoritarian rule is led by Nobel laureate Professor Muhammad Yunus and consists of civil society leaders.
Yunus, a celebrated civil society activist, is well-equipped to put the foundations for a brand new, really democratic Bangladesh. He can draw on the experiences of Bangladeshi civil society to allow social cohesion and produce a couple of much-needed reckoning with the nation’s tortured previous. There are various methods wherein he can defend and broaden civic areas. He can, for instance, disband safety items accountable for enforced disappearances and torture, reform the much-maligned NGO Affairs Bureau to make sure it helps civil society, or amend the Overseas Donations Regulation which creates a bureaucratic maze for civil society to obtain worldwide funding.
He ought to, nonetheless, act quick, as historical past tells us moments of alternative and optimism like this may be fleeting. After a dictatorial regime is eliminated by way of revolution, democratic constructions can fall prey to a rotation of elites. Within the absence of a plan for what’s subsequent, pro-democracy parts could be overwhelmed and derailed by fast-moving occasions.
In such situations, nationalist and authoritarian forces, who proceed to carry energy attributable to their alliances with the clergy and army, typically fill the rising energy vacuum. At instances, the army itself takes over. In different situations, leaders introduced in as representatives of democratic forces flip to repression themselves to try to maintain every little thing collectively.
In Sudan, for instance, the 2019 overthrow of strongman President Omar al-Bashir was adopted by a number of failed makes an attempt at a democratic transition and ultimately a army coup in 2021. Years later, civic house violations proceed unabated and the nation remains to be devastated by battle.
In Pakistan, an preliminary army coup in 1958 supposedly aimed toward creating house for a extra steady democracy was adopted by a number of a long time of army rule and chronic assaults on civil society. Authorities within the nation proceed to silence dissent with crackdowns on activists, protesters, and journalists.
In Ethiopia, when Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed obtained the Nobel Peace Prize in 2019 for lastly securing a peace cope with Eritrea, hopes have been excessive for regional peace and stability. Since then, nonetheless, he has presided over a bloody civil warfare wherein mass atrocities have been dedicated. The nation is in turmoil, with human rights teams urging authorities to cease their crackdown on civic house and respect the rights of political opponents, journalists, and activists.
If Professor Yunus’s authorities fails to embody civil society in resolution making and shore up democratic establishments, post-Hasina Bangladesh may also fall into these pitfalls. However these are, in fact, not the one attainable situations. After a revolution, pro-democracy forces may also keep agency and allow the emergence of extra complicated, but additionally infinitely extra constructive, realities.
Sri Lanka, the place widespread protests compelled President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to resign and flee the nation two years in the past, is one instance. Though issues have been removed from good, a transition of energy occurred by way of established techniques of democracy within the nation. Final month, Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who ran on a promise of higher governance and stability, gained Sri Lanka’s presidential election.
Chile is one other instance of how democratic forces can persevere within the face of elite clawback. Regardless of vital resistance from institution forces, Chile’s standard protests in 2019-2022 towards financial inequality led to a collection of reforms in schooling, healthcare and pensions. Guatemala, the place in January the elected president was inaugurated regardless of repeated makes an attempt by the outdated regime to scuttle a peaceable switch of energy, may also supply helpful classes for Bangladesh’s nascent authorities. In each these situations civil society teams performed a key position.
Whereas revolutions and standard uprisings didn’t produce civic utopias and ideal democracies in any of those international locations, additionally they didn’t lead to a return to sq. one.
Bangladesh’s interim authorities ought to take note of these examples the place civic society secured essential victories in tough and complicated circumstances. It ought to, nonetheless, additionally be taught from instances the place democratic forces failed to forestall the strongmen they helped topple from ultimately being changed by equally corrupt, anti-democratic leaders.
It’s unrealistic to count on any new authorities to supply passable reforms in all areas and an ideal democracy in a single day, particularly after a long time of authoritarian rule. However numerous examples around the globe present that constructing a greater future on the ruins left by long-term authoritarian leaders is feasible – so long as the brand new management acts with dedication, continues the dialogue with civil society, and stays on a democratic course.
If the interim authorities of Yunus will get it unsuitable, and the brand new management begins to try to stifle democratic dissent by suppressing civil society and clamping down on protests – whether or not these protests are by those that assist the earlier regime or others who’re impatient for change – errors made throughout previous transitions elsewhere would possibly find yourself being repeated in Bangladesh. In such a state of affairs, the sustained protests that eliminated Hasina, and Yunus’s tenure as chief, can be decreased to footnotes in a protracted historical past of authoritarian rule.
But when Professor Yunus will get it proper, attracts from the profitable expertise of different international locations, and lays the foundations for a sturdy democracy in Bangladesh, he might turn into a Mandela-like inspirational determine, and supply different international locations in South Asia, the place civic freedoms are broadly repressed, with a regional instance of a profitable post-revolutionary transition. Many within the worldwide neighborhood stand able to assist him.
Bangladesh is at a crossroads, and how Yunus and his advisors are in a position to navigate present political dynamics whereas respecting human rights and civic freedoms will decide the way forward for its democracy.
The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.