The continuing controversy surrounding J.Ok. Rowling‘s views on gender identification has taken one other dramatic flip, as “Harry Potter” star Sean Biggerstaff has publicly referred to as out the creator.
The outburst got here in response to Rowling celebrating a latest U.Ok. Supreme Courtroom ruling that transgender girls should not legally girls.
Along with Sean Biggerstaff, different stars from “Harry Potter,” together with lead actors Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, have disagreed with J.Ok. Rowling’s views about trans girls.
Article continues under commercial
Sean Biggerstaff Feels Bigotry Has Corrupted The Writer’s ‘Wit’

J.Ok. Rowling has as soon as once more come underneath fireplace from a “Harry Potter” alum for her unfavourable views about trans girls.
This time, she was criticized by Sean Biggerstaff, who starred within the fantasy film franchise as Oliver Wooden.
It started with Rowling sharing a controversial publish of her celebrating a latest U.Ok. Supreme Courtroom ruling towards trans girls being legally girls.
Within the publish, Rowling could possibly be seen elevating a glass full of what appeared to be alcohol whereas smoking a cigar aboard her $150 million superyacht.
The publish led to her going through accusations of “smoking a blunt,” to which the billionaire creator clapped again on social media by firmly clarifying that it was “objectively, provably, and demonstrably a cigar.”
Biggerstaff then responded to her publish, saying, “Bigotry rots the wit.”
Article continues under commercial
Doubling down on his criticism, the Harry Potter star additionally retweeted a publish from a social media consumer who in contrast the acclaimed creator to Andrew Tate, a crimson capsule influencer identified for puffing on cigars in a lot of his movies.
“lol, huffing on a cigar now? Is she Andrew Tate?” the tweet learn, per the Each day Mail.
Article continues under commercial
The ‘Harry Potter’ Actor Known as J.Ok. Rowling An ‘Obsessed Billionaire’

In a special publish, Biggerstaff slammed Rowling as an “obsessed billionaire,” exhibiting his distaste concerning the creator allegedly funding the marketing campaign group that introduced the case towards trans girls.
Rowling had first shared an image of the main girls on the case, Susan Smith and Marion Calder, including the comment “in case it wasn’t clear: do not f-ck with Scottish girls.”
Biggerstaff then quoted the publish with, “Nearly all of Scottish girls, who do not agree with these d-ckheads, aren’t being bankrolled by an obsessed billionaire.”
Other than his criticism of Rowling, Biggerstaff additionally expressed help for trans girls in mild of the controversial Supreme Courtroom ruling.
Article continues under commercial
He wrote that the “loudest voices” had been “utilizing concern for sex-based rights as cowl for totally reactionary politics” and referred to as their behaviour “a efficiency of pragmatism to cloak their instinctive distaste for the Different.”
Article continues under commercial
J.Ok. Rowling And The ‘Harry Potter’ Trio Share A Strained Relationship

Prior to now, the “Harry Potter” trio, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, have additionally disagreed with Rowling’s views concerning the transgender neighborhood.
This has led to them having a strained relationship with Rowling, which culminated together with her overtly declaring that she couldn’t “forgive” the trio or different celebrities who help trans folks.
“Celebs who cosied as much as a motion intent on eroding girls’s hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and weak girls reliant on single intercourse areas,” Rowling wrote on X on the time, per the Each day Mail.
“Youngsters have been irreversibly harmed, and 1000’s are complicit, not simply medics, however the celeb mouthpieces, unquestioning media, and cynical companies,” she added later.
Rowling went on to handle the motion as a scandal whose “penalties” will likely be felt for many years and additional doubled down on her criticism of its supporters.
She mentioned, “You probably did all you might to impede and misrepresent analysis. You tried to bully folks out of their jobs for opposing you. Younger folks have been experimented on, left infertile and in ache.”
Article continues under commercial
The Writer Took A Jab At The ‘Harry Potter’ Lead Stars

In a latest publish on X, Rowling appeared to take intention at Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint over their vocal opposition to her remarks about trans folks.
It started with a publish that requested, “What actor/actress immediately ruins a film for you?”
Rowling then responded with a cryptic comment, quoting the publish and writing, “Three guesses… sorry, that was irresistible.”
She additionally added three laughing emojis to her remark, which has since garnered over 69k likes and 22 million views on the social media platform.
The e-book creator made no transfer to make clear what she meant with the comment, which solely made followers additional gasoline hypothesis that she was referring to Radcliffe and his co-stars.
J.Ok. Rowling Has Shared A number of Controversial Tweets About Trans Folks

For months, Rowling has garnered unfavourable consideration for actively sharing controversial views concerning the trans neighborhood, significantly on X.
In a single publish, she claimed, “there aren’t any trans youngsters” in response to a person criticizing her remarks about youngsters throughout the trans neighborhood.
“No baby is ‘born within the mistaken physique,'” the creator wrote. “There are solely adults such as you, ready to sacrifice the well being of minors to bolster your perception in an ideology that may find yourself wreaking extra hurt than lobotomies and false reminiscence syndrome mixed.”
Extra not too long ago, Rowling claimed that “trans folks have misplaced zero rights” following the Supreme Courtroom ruling, whereas additionally taking a jab on the trans neighborhood in her remarks.
Article continues under commercial
“I do not doubt some (not all) will likely be livid that the Supreme Courtroom upheld girls’s sex-based rights,” Rowling additional famous.