Former Stanford pupil King Vanga killed Pamela and Joe Juarez in a automotive crash again in 2021. That’s an undisputed truth. When the Juarez household instructed the college about the entire “killing two folks” factor, nonetheless, Vanga sued for defamation, claiming they couldn’t name him a assassin as a result of he had solely been charged with vehicular manslaughter. Because the Stanford Day by day stories, although, in an precise victory free of charge speech protections, Vanga misplaced his lawsuit towards Priscilla Juarez late final month.
King Vanga, who killed Pamela and Joe Juarez along with his automotive, initially claimed a letter the Juarez household despatched Stanford was defamatory as a result of in it, they referred to as him a assassin, claimed he was beneath the affect on the time of the crash and asserted that he’d violated the Stanford Code of Conduct. Vanga denied all of these claims. The courtroom disagreed, saying the homicide and code of conduct claims had been opinions and regarded protected speech beneath the First Modification. The courtroom additionally dominated that Juarez had cause to consider Vanga was beneath the affect on the time of the crash because it had been reported within the native information regardless of Vanga’s declare on the contrary:
On June 25, 2021, Vanga was concerned in a automotive accident in Atwater, California, which resulted within the deaths of Jose and Pamela Juarez. Vanga was charged with two counts of gross vehicular manslaughter whereas intoxicated, resisting an govt officer, making an attempt to take a peace officer’s firearm and battery upon a peace officer. Vanga pleaded not responsible to those fees.
Vanga allegedly declined a breathalyzer check on the scene, in response to the legislation enforcement officer who responded to the accident. Nonetheless, the officer claimed that Vanga was beneath the affect. In keeping with the police report, the officer “detected a powerful odor of alcoholic beverage emitting from [Vanga’s] breath and particular person and noticed his eyes had been pink.”
The media tales that circulated within the subsequent days additionally said Vanga had been beneath the affect of both medicine, alcohol or each, as per legislation enforcement stories quoted inside the case.
This prompted Priscilla Juarez and a number of different relations to write down emails and letters to Stanford. In her e mail, she wrote she hoped the College would “take correct motion in dismissing this man as an lively pupil of [the] morally prestigious establishment.”
…
In December 2021, Vanga threatened to sue Atwater police and California Freeway Patrol for alleged mistreatment and false accusation of a DUI. Vanga alleged he was punched, kicked and tased twice by responding officers. In the meantime, blood samples from the night time of the accident confirmed no presence of medicine or alcohol.
Lawyer Ken “Popehat” White represented Juarez within the go well with, submitting an anti-SLAPP movement to have it dismissed on the grounds that the go well with violated his shopper’s First Modification rights. SLAPP stands for Strategic Lawsuit In opposition to Public Participation and customarily refers to lawsuits filed on questionable grounds with the intent to stifle free speech. Anti-SLAPP statutes enable defendants to have these lawsuits dismissed if the movement is granted and likewise get well any lawyer’s charges.
“There’s a pattern the place wealthy folks suppose that the poor ought to solely have as a lot free speech as they’ll afford. And that to me, [that’s] what this case was about, and that’s why I’m glad now we have a instrument just like the anti-SLAPP statute,” White instructed the Day by day.
Sadly for the Juarezes, Vanga additionally filed defamation fits towards different relations and people nonetheless haven’t been in entrance of a decide. However whereas nothing is assured, it seems like White believes there’s a superb probability they’ll see comparable outcomes, telling the Day by day, “Each case is just a little completely different as a result of each case relies on what that defendant mentioned of their letter [to Stanford]. However for my part, [Priscilla Juarez’s family members] needs to be very optimistic based mostly on this outcome.”
As we talked about when we first reported on this lawsuit, nobody pressured Vanga to sue the Juarez household. He may have merely let this entire factor go and targeted on making ready for his doubtless conviction. The results of killing two folks aren’t normally pleasing, however odds are, he in all probability would have remained largely unknown exterior of the Bay Space. As an alternative, he had the audacity to sue the household of the folks he killed along with his automotive, and in doing so, drew the eye of nationwide media. Consequently, way more folks know King Vanga killed Pamela and Joe Juarez along with his automotive in 2021.
It isn’t clear when King Vanga’s prison trial will start, however hopefully, it doesn’t take an excessive amount of longer. He deserves to face the implications for what he did, whether or not he was beneath the affect on the time of the crash or not.