In half 1 of this collection, we examined how fragmented AI rules and the absence of common governance frameworks are making a belief hole — and a dilemma — for enterprises. 4 burning questions emerged, leaving us on a cliffhanger.
Fast recap
Q: What had been the foremost considerations raised on the Paris AI Summit relating to AI governance?
A: The summit highlighted the shortage of world consensus on AI governance, posing important challenges for enterprises attempting to steadiness innovation and compliance in a fragmented regulatory panorama.
Q: Why does the absence of common AI insurance policies improve reputational dangers for companies?
A: With out common insurance policies, organizations should rely extra closely on sturdy cybersecurity and GRC practices to guard their reputations and handle dangers related to the dealing with of delicate knowledge and IP.
Q: What have we discovered concerning the efficiency of GRC, AI governance, and safety compliance instruments?
A: These instruments have typically excessive person satisfaction, although customers face challenges associated to setup complexity and ranging timelines for attaining ROI. However, there’s extra to discover and discover out the reply to the burning query, “Is governance changing into the silent killer of AI innovation?”
If Half 1 confirmed us the issue, Half 2 is all concerning the playbook.
GRC leaders can count on a data-backed benchmark for smarter funding choices as our knowledge evaluation will reveal the instruments delivering actual worth and the way satisfaction scores differ throughout areas, firm sizes, and management roles.
You’ll additionally get an inside have a look at how main distributors like Drata, FloQast, AuditBoard, and extra are embedding accountable AI into product growth, shaping inside insurance policies, and future-proofing their methods.
As corporations courageous the complexities of AI governance, understanding the views of key leaders like CTOs, CISOs, and AI governance executives turns into important.
Why? As a result of these stakeholders are pivotal in shaping a company’s danger posture. Let’s discover what these leaders consider present instruments and zoom in on their GRC priorities.
How happy are CTOs, CISOs, and AI governance executives?
CTOs, CISOs, and AI governance executives every deliver distinct views. Their satisfaction scores stay excessive total, however priorities and ache factors differ primarily based on their duties and involvement.
CTOs need streamlined compliance and smarter workflows
CTOs rated safety compliance instruments 4.72/5 by way of person satisfaction.
They worth time-saving automation, progress monitoring with end-to-end visibility, and responsive assist, however are pissed off by device fragmentation and restricted non-cyber danger options.
Safety compliance instruments helped CTOs clear up issues relating to ISO 27001/DORA/GDPR compliance, vendor danger, and audit monitoring.
Along with safety compliance instruments, we additionally discovered knowledge on how CTOs really feel about GRC instruments.
CTOs rated GRC instruments 4.07/5 by way of person satisfaction.
CTOs worth the hyperlink between GRC and audit integrations, automation in service provider onboarding, and intuitive person expertise. Frustrations come up round advanced deployment and time-consuming configuration occasions. GRC instruments helped CTOs deal with dangers associated to fast service provider progress, compliance, and audit readiness.
CISOs prioritize audit readiness and framework mapping
CISOs rated safety compliance instruments 4.72/5 by way of person satisfaction.
CISOs admire audit readiness, framework mapping integrations and automation however dislike outdated coaching options and complicated coverage navigation. Safety compliance software program helped CISOs clear up issues associated to framework administration, process prioritization, and steady danger protection.
Curiously, CISOs aren’t instantly concerned with GRC instruments as they delegate down the chain. Their groups — like safety engineers, danger managers, or GRC specialists are sometimes those evaluating and interacting with these instruments day by day and usually tend to submit suggestions.
AI governance leaders count on sensible, scalable, danger options
G2 knowledge revealed that whereas CISOs and CTOs aren’t closely concerned with AI governance tooling (contemplating it’s a new “baby” class), AI governance executives like community and safety engineers and heads of compliance appear to be lively reviewers.
AI governance executives rated safety compliance instruments 4.5/5 by way of person satisfaction.
They praised AI governance instruments for automated menace detection and AI-powered knowledge dealing with and buyer response enhancements. Whereas ache factors included implementation hurdles, system efficiency lag, and upkeep burden. Danger remediation, knowledge technique, and enhancing safety group’s efficiency are key issues solved for these customers.
Constructing on insights from satisfaction knowledge, let’s delve into how corporations are creatively bridging the compliance and AI governance hole.
Transformative methods: changing governance challenges into alternatives
Partly 1, we talked about that corporations are DIY-ing their approach by means of compliance in a world with out common AI rules. Right here’s a have a look at how GRC software program leaders are augmenting innovation whereas sustaining their danger posture.
Accountable AI’s position in self-regulation
Self-regulation could be a double-edged sword. Whereas its flexibility permits companies to maneuver rapidly and innovate with out ready for coverage mandates, it might probably result in a scarcity of accountability and elevated danger publicity.
Privateness-first platform Non-public AI’s Patricia Thaine remarks, “Firms now depend on internally outlined finest practices, resulting in AI deployment inefficiencies and inconsistencies.”
On account of ambiguous business pointers, corporations are compelled to craft their very own AI governance frameworks by guiding their actions with a accountable AI mindset.
Alon Yamin, Co-founder and Chief Government Officer of Copyleaks, highlights that with out standardized pointers, companies could delay developments. However these implementing accountable AI can set finest practices, form insurance policies, and construct belief in AI applied sciences.
“Firms that embed accountable AI rules into their core enterprise technique shall be higher positioned to navigate future rules and preserve a aggressive edge,” feedback Matt Blumberg, Chief Government Officer at Acrolinx.
Counting on present worldwide requirements to outrun competitors
Companies are utilizing the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 synthetic intelligence administration system (AIMS) and ISO/IEC 23894 certification as guardrails to sort out the AI governance hole.
“Trusted organizations are already offering steering to position guardrails across the acceptable use of AI. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is a key instance,” provides Tara Darbyshire, Co-founder and EVP at SmartSuite.
Some view the regulatory hole as an opportunity to achieve a aggressive edge by understanding rivals’ reluctance and making knowledgeable AI investments.
Mike Whitmire famous that FloQast’s future give attention to transparency and accountability in AI regulation led them to pursue ISO 42001 certification for accountable AI growth.
The EU’s AI Continent Motion Plan, a 200 billion-euro initiative, goals to position Europe on the forefront of AI by boosting infrastructure and moral requirements. This transfer indicators how governance frameworks can drive innovation, making it crucial for GRC and AI leaders to look at how the EU balances regulation and progress, providing a recent template for world methods.
Remodel your AI advertising technique.
Be a part of business leaders at G2’s free AI in Motion Roadshow for actionable insights and confirmed methods to reimagine your funnel. Register now
Product growth methods from GRC and AI consultants
Bridging world discrepancies in AI governance is not any small feat. Organizations face a tangled net of rules that usually battle throughout areas, making compliance a shifting goal.
So, how are VPs of safety, CISOs, and founders bridging the AI governance hole and fostering innovation whereas guaranteeing compliance? They gave us a glance below the hood.
Privateness-first innovation: Drata and Non-public AI
Drata embraces the core tenets of safety, equity, security, reliability, and privateness to information each the corporate’s organizational values and its AI growth practices. The group focuses on empowering customers ethically and adopting accountable, technology-agnostic rules.
“Amid the fast adoption of AI throughout all industries, we take each a calculated and intentional strategy to innovating on AI, centered on defending delicate person knowledge, serving to guarantee our instruments present clear explanations round AI reasoning and steering, and subjecting all AI fashions to rigorous testing,” informs Matt Hillary, Vice President of Safety & CISO at Drata.
Non-public AI believes privacy-first design is a quick monitor to mitigate danger and speed up innovation.
“We guarantee compliance with out slowing innovation by de-identifying knowledge earlier than AI processing and re-identifying it inside a safe atmosphere. This lets builders give attention to constructing whereas assembly regulatory expectations and inside security necessities,” explains Patricia Thaine, Chief Government Officer and Co-founder of Non-public AI.
Coverage-led governance: AuditBoard’s framework
AuditBoard takes a considerate strategy to crafting acceptable use insurance policies that greenlight innovation with out compromising compliance.
Richard Marcus, CISO at AuditBoard, feedback, “A well-crafted AI key management coverage will guarantee AI adoption is compliant with rules and insurance policies and that solely correctly licensed knowledge is ever uncovered to the AI options. It must also guarantee solely licensed personnel have entry to datasets, fashions, and the AI instruments themselves.”
AuditBoard emphasizes the significance of:
- Creating a transparent record of accepted generative AI instruments
- Establishing steering on permissible knowledge classes and high-risk use instances
- Limiting automated determination making and mannequin coaching on delicate knowledge
- Implementing human-in-the-loop processes with audit trails
These rules scale back the chance of knowledge leakage and assist detect uncommon exercise by means of sturdy entry controls and monitoring.
Requirements-based implementation: SmartSuite’s AI governance mannequin
Tara Darbyshire, SmartSuite’s Co-founder and EVP, shared an overview of efficient AI governance that allows innovation whereas aligning with worldwide requirements.
- Defining and implementing AI controls: Organizations should collect necessities for any AI-related exercise, assess danger components, and outline controls aligned with frameworks reminiscent of ISO/IEC 42001. Governance begins with sturdy insurance policies and consciousness.
- Operationalizing governance by means of GRC platforms: Coverage creation, assessment, and dissemination needs to be centralized to make sure accessibility and readability throughout groups. Instruments like SmartSuite consolidate compliance knowledge, allow real-time monitoring, and assist ISO audits.
- Conducting focused danger assessments: Not all actions require the identical controls. Understanding danger posture permits groups to develop proportional mitigation methods that guarantee each effectiveness and compliance.
Cross-functional execution: how FloQast embeds AI compliance
FloQast achieves the compliance-innovation steadiness by embedding governance into the AI growth lifecycle from the beginning.
“Fairly than ready for AI rules to take form, we align our AI governance with globally acknowledged finest practices, guaranteeing our options meet the very best requirements for transparency, ethics, and safety.” — Mike Whitmire, CEO and Co-Founding father of FloQast.
For FloQast, efficient AI governance isn’t siloed; it’s cross-collaborative by design. “Compliance isn’t only a authorized or IT concern. It’s a precedence that requires alignment throughout R&D, finance, authorized, and govt management.”
FloQast’s methods on operationalizing governance:
- AI committee: A cross-functional group, together with product, compliance, and know-how leads, anticipates regulatory traits and ensures strategic alignment.
- Audits: Common inside and exterior audits maintain governance protocols present with evolving moral and safety requirements.
- Coaching: Governance coaching is rolled out company-wide, guaranteeing that compliance turns into a shared accountability throughout roles.
Mike additionally emphasizes the significance of injecting compliance into firm tradition.
By combining construction with adaptability, FloQast is constructing a GRC technique that protects its prospects and model whereas empowering innovation.
Future-focused methods are essential to organizational success to face up to world modifications. Whereas there’s no crystal ball to point out us the way forward for AI and GRC, inspecting skilled insights and predictions will help us higher put together.
4 predictions for GRC evolution
We requested safety leaders, analysts, and founders how they see AI governance evolving within the subsequent 5 years and what ripple results it might need on innovation, regulation, and belief.
AI rules could lack significant enforcement
Lauren Value questioned the sensible influence of latest rules and identified that if present penalties for knowledge breaches are any indication, AI-related enforcement may fall wanting prompting significant change.
Belief administration methods will information native and world AI governance
Drata’s Matt Hillary predicts {that a} common AI coverage is unlikely, given regional regulatory variations, however foresees the rise of cheap rules that may present innovation with danger mitigation guardrails.
He additionally emphasizes how belief shall be a core tenet in trendy GRC efforts. As new dangers emerge and frameworks evolve at native, nationwide, and world ranges, organizations will face larger complexity in repeatedly demonstrating trustworthiness to customers and regulators.
Acceptable use insurance policies and world frameworks will outline accountable AI deployment
AuditBoard’s Richard Marcus underscores the significance of well-defined insurance policies that greenlight secure innovation. Frameworks just like the EU AI Act, the NIST AI Danger Administration Framework, and ISO 42001 will inform compliant product growth.
Governance applied sciences will unlock each compliance and innovation
Non-public AI’s Patricia Thaine predicts that the chance and innovation steadiness shall be a actuality. As rules and buyer expectations mature, corporations utilizing GRC instruments will profit from simplified compliance and improved knowledge entry, accelerating accountable innovation.
Bonus: Safety compliance software program reveals future innovation hotspots
Reducing by means of the anomaly of a fragmented governance panorama, we analyzed regional sentiment knowledge to establish the place innovation ecosystems are forming, and why sure areas would possibly change into early movers in accountable AI deployment.
For this, we centered on the safety compliance software program class because it gives a useful lens into the place governance innovation could speed up. Excessive satisfaction scores and adoption patterns in key areas sign broader readiness for scalable, cross-functional GRC and AI governance practices.
APAC: cloud-first automation results in standout satisfaction
With a satisfaction rating of 4.78, APAC tops the charts. Excessive adoption of cloud compliance automation and diminished handbook workflows make the area a standout. This displays sturdy vendor assist and well-tailored compliance options.
Latin America: regional agility drives belief and momentum
Latin American customers report sturdy satisfaction (4.68), pushed by localized compliance assist and platforms suitable with agile processes.
North America: mature platforms however strain on post-sale assist
North America’s satisfaction rating reveals sturdy confidence in mature software program choices that meet the calls for of stringent rules, particularly in industries like finance, healthcare, and authorities. These instruments are clearly constructed for scale, however lagging assist responsiveness hints at post-sale ache factors. In high-stakes AI governance environments, sluggish problem decision and delayed escalations might change into a legal responsibility until distributors double down on buyer success.
EMEA: massive enterprises thrive, however usability gaps maintain others again
With an improved satisfaction rating of 4.65, EMEA exhibits rising confidence in dependable compliance software program, notably amongst massive enterprises investing in scalable governance instruments. Nevertheless, smaller organizations nonetheless face usability limitations, usually missing the interior safety groups wanted to maximise platform worth. To unlock broader adoption of AI governance, distributors should deal with this accessibility hole throughout mid-market and leaner groups.
As world demand for governance know-how grows, areas like APAC and Latin America might change into early hubs for GRC and AI governance innovation. These areas spotlight the place momentum, satisfaction, and agile suggestions loops might foster next-gen compliance and AI governance maturity.
So, is governance actually changing into the silent killer of AI innovation?
As new rules emerge and buyer expectations shift, governance is not going to be non-obligatory however foundational to reliable, scalable AI innovation.
And as governance tooling evolves, cross-functional utility and built-in frameworks shall be key to changing friction into ahead movement.
Leaders who embrace compliance as a strategic perform and never only a checkbox shall be well-positioned to adapt, entice belief, and drive accountable progress.
As a result of within the race for AI benefit, because it seems, governance isn’t the silent killer — it’s the unlikely enabler.
Loved this deep-dive evaluation? Subscribe to the G2 Tea publication right now for the most popular takes in your inbox.
Edited by Supanna Das