Kate O’Neill on AI, Threat, & Readiness


Image this: It is 2025. Your advertising and marketing intern used an AI device to generate content material to your greatest shopper and by chance included hallucinated product options and hit ship earlier than anybody may evaluate it. 

Gave you a chill, didn’t it?

Because the creator economic system races to undertake generative AI instruments, taking a pause to construct a correct content material governance ought to be the next step. 

Fortunate for us, the creator of “What Issues Subsequent” and the founder and CEO of KO Insights, Kate O’Neill, shared her knowledge on navigating the wild west of AI-powered content material creation earlier than your group faces its personal content material disaster.

This interview is a part of G2’s Q&A collection. For extra content material like this, subscribe to G2 Tea, a e-newsletter with SaaS-y information and leisure.

To look at the total interview, try the video under:

Contained in the trade with Kate O’Neill

Your newest e-book, “What Issues Subsequent,” addresses future-ready decision-making. Are you able to inform us how this is applicable particularly to content material danger administration?

I feel future-ready resolution making is an idea or a mindset that entails a stability between enterprise targets and human values. This performs out in tech as a result of the dimensions and scope of tech resolution making is so big. And a number of leaders really feel daunted by how complicated the choice making is. 

Inside content material danger administration, what we’re is a necessity for governance and a type of coverage to be put in place. We’re additionally a proactive method that is past simply regulatory compliance. 

The hot button is understanding what issues in your present actuality whereas anticipating what shall be vital sooner or later, all guided by a transparent understanding of what your group is attempting to perform and what defines your values.

I feel the deal with growing sturdy inner frameworks will actually profit folks in relation to content material danger. And people frameworks ought to be primarily based on goal and organizational values. It is extremely vital to have a very clear understanding of what it’s the group is attempting to perform and what it’s that defines their values.

Ai in Action

Remodel your AI advertising and marketing technique.

Be a part of trade leaders at G2’s free AI in Motion Roadshow for actionable insights and confirmed methods to reimagine your funnel. Register now

Speaking about content material dangers, what are probably the most important hidden dangers in content material methods that organizations usually overlook, and the way can they be extra acutely aware sooner or later?

Once I labored for a big enterprise on the intranet workforce, our focus was not simply on content material dissemination but in addition on sustaining content material integrity, managing laws, and stopping duplication. For instance, totally different departments typically saved their very own copies of paperwork, just like the code of conduct. Nevertheless, updating these paperwork may result in inconsistent variations throughout departments, leading to “orphaned” or outdated content material.

One other traditional instance that I’ve seen so many instances is a few sort of work course of getting instantiated after which codified into documentation. However that doc represents one individual’s quirky preferences, which change into ingrained in documentation even after that individual leaves. This results in sustaining non-essential data with out a clear purpose. And so I feel these are the sorts of issues which are very low-key sort of dangers. These are low-harm dangers, though they add up over time. 

What we’re seeing within the higher-risk stakes isn’t having readability or transparency throughout communications and never having the ability to perceive which stakeholders are accountable for various items of content material. 

Additionally, with generative AI getting used inside organizations, we see lots of people producing their very own variations of content material after which sending that out on behalf of the corporate to purchasers or to outside-facing media organizations. And people aren’t essentially sanctioned by the stakeholders inside the group who wish to have some sort of governance over documentation.

A complete content material technique that addresses these points at regulatory, compliance, and enterprise engagement ranges would go a great distance towards mitigating these dangers.

With content material methods turning into international, how regulatory variations throughout international markets have sophisticated content material danger administration, significantly with the emergence of generative AI. What particular compliance points ought to organizations be most involved about?

We see this lots in lots of fields of AI. We’re seeing how generative AI, significantly due to its widespread use, is clashing with international laws. Particularly in areas just like the U.S., the place deregulation is distinguished, corporations face challenges in establishing efficient inner governance frameworks. Such inner governance frameworks are essential to make sure their resilience in international markets and to forestall points just like the dissemination of unrepresentative content material that might misalign with an organization’s values or positions, probably compromising security and safety.

We want to consider resilience and future readiness from an organization management standpoint. And which means having the ability to say, “We want the perfect sort of procedures for us, for our group.” And that is most likely going to imply being adaptable to any market. Should you do enterprise globally, you must be ready to your content material to be consumed or engaged with by international markets. 

“I feel specializing in growing worth pushed frameworks that transcend particular laws is the precise strategy to go.”

Kate O’Neill
Founder and CEO of KO Insights

We have to assume proactively about governance in order that we will create the sort of aggressive benefit and resilience that can assist us navigate international markets and altering circumstances. As a result of as quickly as any explicit authorities modifications to a unique chief, we might even see full fluctuation in these regulatory states. 

So, by specializing in long-term methods, corporations can defend their content material, folks, and stakeholders and keep ready for shifts in governmental insurance policies and international market dynamics.

I see that you simply’re very energetic on LinkedIn, and also you discuss AI capabilities and human values intertwining. So, contemplating the stability between AI capabilities and human values, what framework do you advocate for making certain that AI-powered content material instruments align with human-centric values and never vice versa?

Opposite to the assumption that human-centric or values-driven frameworks stifle innovation, I imagine they really improve it. When you perceive what your group is attempting to perform and the way it advantages each inner and exterior stakeholders, innovation turns into simpler inside these well-defined guardrails.

I like to recommend utilizing the “now-next continuum” framework from my e-book “What Issues Subsequent.” This entails figuring out your priorities now, participating in situation planning about possible future outcomes, defining your most popular outcomes, and dealing on closing the hole between possible outcomes and most popular outcomes. 

This train, utilized via a human-centric lens, is definitely the perfect factor I can consider to facilitate innovation as a result of it actually means that you can transfer rapidly but in addition lets you understand that you simply’re not shifting so rapidly that you simply’re harming folks. It creates a stability between technological functionality and moral duty that advantages each the enterprise and the people linked to it.

“Take into consideration the stability between technological functionality and moral duty and do this in a means that advantages the enterprise and the people which are in and out of doors of the enterprise on the similar time.”

Kate O’Neill
Founder and CEO of KO Insights

Wanting forward, what expertise ought to content material groups develop now to be ready for future content material dangers?

Content material groups ought to deal with growing expertise that mix technical understanding with moral issues till this integration turns into second nature. The opposite factor needs to be proactive management and actually excited about how there’s a number of uncertainty due to geopolitics, local weather, AI, and different quite a few matters. 

And given the uncertainty of this time, I feel there is a tendency to really feel very caught. As a substitute, that is really the perfect time to look forward and do the integrative work of understanding what issues now and what’s going to matter sooner or later — from one 12 months to 100 years forward. 

The hot button is pulling these future issues into your present selections, actions, and priorities. This forward-looking integration is the essence of “What Issues Subsequent” and represents the talents many individuals want proper now.

Should you loved this insightful dialog, subscribe to G2 Tea for the most recent tech and advertising and marketing thought management.

Comply with Kate O’Neill on LinkedIn to know extra about AI ethics, content material governance and accountable tech. 


Edited by Supanna Das



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *