Status TV has redefined spy thrillers. If Bond doesn’t evolve, one of the best espionage tales will occur with out him.
Not too long ago, I watched The Company, a remake of a French spy collection starring Michael Fassbender. Streaming on Paramount+ with Showtime’s premium tier, it hooked me so utterly that I really paid additional simply to complete watching after a free preview on Youtube—one thing I virtually by no means do, since I’m continually searching for an excuse to cancel streaming companies attributable to their shallow content material libraries.
It proves how long-form storytelling elevates espionage narratives—giving missions time to unfold and characters area to develop in methods a single movie by no means may. These aren’t simply motion sequences stitched collectively. They’re strategic, psychological, and relentless.
One of many best strengths of The Company is its dedication to slow-burning rigidity, meticulous spycraft, and layered deception. The collection follows intelligence brokers navigating an intricate net of rivalries and betrayals, the place operations unfold over weeks, not hours. Watching it, I saved pondering: why hasn’t Bond gotten this therapy?
It got here on the heels of watching The Day of the Jackal final fall, starring Eddie Redmayne, which had already set the gears turning. Like The Company, it bolstered the concept status TV isn’t simply one other format for spy tales. It’s one of the best one.
The Mission: Inconceivable Issue
The Mission: Inconceivable franchise proves that episodic, action-driven spy adventures can nonetheless carry emotional weight, whereas The Company excels at grounded psychological complexity and long-term penalties.
Bond movies have at all times blended globe-trotting journey with espionage intrigue, however squeezing each right into a two-hour runtime forces compromises. The motion set items don’t construct with the rising depth of Mission: Inconceivable‘s stunt-based circus, whereas the spycraft lacks the suspense depth that status dramas can discover over a number of hours.
Bond has the chance to be the largest and name-worthy espionage collection potential. It wouldn’t compete with the movies. It could deepen the franchise.
The place Bond Movies Succeed—And The place They Fall Brief
Bond movies invented the artwork of glossy, cinematic spy spectacle. The Shanghai battle sequence in Skyfall, the prepare brawl in On line casino Royale, the Mexico Metropolis monitoring shot in Spectre—every a showcase of motion crafted with precision and magnificence. The issue isn’t execution. It’s format. A two-hour movie forces Bond to juggle explosive set items and espionage intrigue.
Bond’s tradecraft—the deep-cover assignments, shifting allegiances, and psychological toll—will get diminished to fast montages earlier than the subsequent explosion. A two-hour blockbuster doesn’t have the area for a slow-burning unraveling. That’s the place a collection has the benefit.
Considered one of The Company’s strongest storylines follows an intelligence officer extracted from deep cowl, solely to have his previous come crashing into his current. The reappearance of a girl with whom he shared a fabricated romance—a relationship that was actual for her however a mission for him—sparks an against-protocol affair. What ought to have been knowledgeable severance spirals right into a disaster of allegiance, together with his personal company questioning whether or not he’s compromised.
That is the type of inner battle Bond has at all times had the potential for however not often explores with depth. Think about a Bond collection that begins with 007 coming back from years undercover, struggling to reacclimate to London—after which working into somebody from his previous life, somebody he was by no means speculated to see once more. A movie can contact on this. As The Company proves, a ten-episode collection may stay in it.
However a long-form Bond collection wouldn’t should lean totally into psychological weight and brooding rigidity. Status TV has already confirmed it might probably deal with espionage storytelling with out dropping persona.
An awesome instance is Black Doves, starring Ben Whishaw—acquainted to Bond followers as Q within the Craig period. In contrast to the psychological weight of The Company or the bureaucratic cynicism of Gradual Horses, Black Doves balances espionage intrigue with sharp writing, humor, and persona. What stunned me most was how a lot actual depth it packed into its plot, character growth, and supreme decision, significantly given its tone. It by no means felt light-weight or inconsequential, even with its playfulness.
That’s precisely what a Bond collection may do. Bond has at all times thrived on that stability—lethal critical when it must be, however by no means joyless. A status TV collection wouldn’t should mimic the tone of The Company of The Day of the Jackal precisely; it may weave within the sharp dialogue, dry humor, and easy cool that outline Bond at his finest, whereas nonetheless delivering significant character arcs and weighty espionage storytelling.
That blend of intelligence, rigidity, and psychological complexity is one thing the Bond novels have at all times understood higher than the movies.
From Russia with Love spends its opening chapters detailing SMERSH’s assassination plot, growing Pink Grant’s backstory, and organising Bond’s downfall earlier than he even seems. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service lingers on Bond’s deep-cover id as genealogist Sir Hilary Bray, emphasizing the sluggish realization that Blofeld is forward of him. Fleming additionally explores Bond’s emotional price—On line casino Royale reveals him questioning his humanity after torture, and From Russia with Love leaves him bodily and psychologically wrecked.
These layers within the movies, typically compressed to a mere nod, or omitted totally, would thrive in a status TV collection, permitting the viewers to take a seat with the stress, deception, and psychological weight that outline Bond on the web page.
The Villain Downside
An awesome villain doesn’t simply threaten Bond. They hang-out him.
Bond villains are constructed to burn vivid and quick—large monologues, grandiose plans, then demise.
The Day of the Jackal takes the other strategy. We don’t simply hear that the murderer is a grasp of deception—we watch him construct false identities, set up secure homes, manipulate contacts, and keep one step forward of legislation enforcement throughout a number of episodes. The stress isn’t simply in whether or not he’ll succeed—it’s in how a lot injury he’ll do earlier than they’ll cease him.
A Bond collection may introduce a villain who isn’t simply an impediment. Somebody Bond can’t outgun in two hours however should outthink over a whole season. Over time, this villain wouldn’t simply threaten Bond; they might corrode him, forcing MI6—and the viewers, as The Company does—to query his loyalty, his judgment, even his sanity.
Bond films have pulled this off in flashes—Le Chiffre’s poker recreation in On line casino Royale constructed stakes masterfully—however a status TV collection may permit for a really methodical, devastating antagonist. Status TV villains don’t simply threaten the hero; they dismantle him piece by piece.
MI6: Extra Than Only a Mission Hub
MI6 in Bond movies is a backdrop for exposition, not a battleground. However in a collection, it could possibly be an influence wrestle—rival spies, bureaucratic warfare, and missions formed as a lot by inner conflicts as exterior threats.
The Company, Jackal, and Gradual Horses get this proper. Intelligence work isn’t nearly discipline brokers; it’s about political maneuvering, shifting alliances, and the fallout of unseen choices. The Company, particularly, reveals how espionage on the highest ranges is constructed on each belief and deception—not simply towards adversaries, however inside the group itself. MI6 ought to really feel like a dwelling entity, pushed by profession operatives with their very own agendas.
A Bond collection may lastly present MI6 as greater than a spot the place M yells at Bond earlier than handing him a brand new goal. Think about a division the place rival factions push conflicting intelligence, the place analysts resent discipline brokers, the place the politics of espionage matter as a lot because the missions themselves. A world the place MI6 isn’t simply reacting to international threats—it’s shaping them.
If Gradual Horses could make a whole present about MI5’s misfits and screw-ups, think about what a Bond collection may do with MI6’s elite.
A single movie can’t construct stakes that final. A Bond collection would.
Lengthy-form storytelling permits victories and losses to matter. The Penguin thrives on fallout—betrayals reshape alliances, energy struggles shift the board, and no motion goes with out consequence. It proves that even a once-dismissed caricature can anchor a gripping, layered story—arguably higher than the high-budget, status Joker movie, which nonetheless handled its lead as a psychological case research slightly than a real energy participant.
A Bond collection may do the identical for characters who’ve spent many years trapped in inflexible archetypes. Think about a model of M, Q, or Moneypenny with full-season arcs, formed by their very own ambitions, rivalries, and previous errors. Think about a Bond woman given the narrative weight of a completely realized character slightly than a fleeting love curiosity. Think about villains who don’t simply threaten Bond for 2 hours however have compelling motivations.
A status collection wouldn’t simply deepen Bond’s world—it could lastly let the folks round him matter.
Bond films have touched on this—Skyfall explored M’s previous, On line casino Royale made Vesper’s demise hit onerous—however the format doesn’t let these penalties linger. Quantum of Solace rushed via Bond’s grief. No Time to Die killed off Felix Leiter, however his loss barely registered earlier than the subsequent motion sequence.
Think about totally developed characters dying on missions gaining the intel Bond in the end makes use of in his personal. Think about a season the place each mission builds towards an intelligence conflict that forces MI6 into uneasy alliances, pitting double brokers towards one another whereas the road between ally and enemy blurs. Think about multi-episode arcs centered totally on the aftermath of a botched mission, the place Bond isn’t simply searching down a villain—he’s coping with the explored fallout of his personal errors.
These are stakes that may’t be inbuilt a single movie. A Bond collection would change that.
Is a Status Bond Collection a Excessive Stakes Mission?
There are dangers, after all. Mishandle a Bond collection, and the model weakens. Casting presents one other problem—ought to the identical actor play Bond in each mediums? (Craig’s feedback on the rigor and time of movie manufacturing recommend that’s unlikely.) Would audiences embrace a long-form Bond or dismiss it as a demotion or redundant?
However The Penguin proved one thing very important. It didn’t simply inform a fantastic story; it expanded the Batman universe with out diminishing the movies. It confirmed how long-form storytelling can add depth slightly than distraction. Bond deserves the identical therapy.
And status TV has already rewritten the principles for espionage. The Company, The Day of The Jackal, The Evening Supervisor, Black Doves and Gradual Horses show that long-form storytelling isn’t simply good for spy thrillers—it’s now the easiest way to inform them.
And one of the best half?
The movies don’t should cease.
Let the collection deal with the depth.
Let the movies keep explosive.
That’s how Bond stays forward of the spy recreation—by taking part in the lengthy one.▪
Learn extra: